Measuring Exploration Coverage and Evaluating Refinding Mechanisms
نویسنده
چکیده
I discuss the issues of measuring exploration coverage to evaluate exploratory interaction techniques. I also discuss the ‘refinding’ problem in visual data exploration and how refinding techniques can be evaluated.
منابع مشابه
Factors and Evaluation of Refinding Behaviors
In this paper we describe difficulties involved in studying PIM behaviors and factors that can affect how people approach the refinding process. Factors that have been studied in the context of information seeking behaviors are summarized and their application to PIM and refinding are discussed. Finally, we note the importance of task in evaluating information refinding and reuse behaviors and ...
متن کاملRefinding Is Not Finding Again
A challenging problem for Internet users today is how to refind information that they have seen before. We believe that finding and refinding are different user activities and require different types of support. The problem of how to find information on the web is studied extensively – new search algorithms, support for natural language queries, and innovative document indexing techniques are c...
متن کاملMeasuring the Quality of a SystemC Testbench by using Code Coverage Techniques
The system description language SystemC enables to quickly create executable specifications at adequate levels of abstraction for both hardware/software integration and fast design space exploration. Besides the modeling of a system, verification has become a dominant factor in circuit and system design. Since SystemC is a versatile language based on C++, testbenches at different abstraction le...
متن کاملMethods for evaluating and covering the design space during early design development
This paper gives an overview of methods used for Design Space Exploration (DSE) at the systemand micro-architecture levels. The DSE problem is considered to be two orthogonal issues: (I) How could a single design point be evaluated, (II) how could the design space be covered during the exploration process? The latter question arises since an exhaustive exploration of the design space by evaluat...
متن کاملMoving Towards Accountability for Reasonableness – A Systematic Exploration of the Features of Legitimate Healthcare Coverage Decision-Making Processes Using Rare Diseases and Regenerative Therapies as a Case Study
Background The accountability for reasonableness (A4R) framework defines 4 conditions for legitimate healthcare coverage decision processes: Relevance, Publicity, Appeals, and Enforcement. The aim of this study was to reflect on how the diverse features of decision-making processes can be aligned with A4R conditions to guide decisio...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008